Danman27 said:
Miyamotoo said:
Danman27 said:
I really just don't see how this game will sell that well. It's a new type of shooter, sure, but was anyone really asking for a shooter like this? To me, it gives off a vibe of a $20 downloadble game, not a $60 release. Like if fat princess cost the price of a full game. It just doesn't look worth it to me. I'm not saying that this looks like a bad game by any means, I just don't see how this game has mass appeal. Can someone honestly explain this to me? Because I really just don't see where all this confidence is coming from.
|
Why you get vibes of $20 downloadable game?
In current state, It have single player campaign of around 7 hours, it have 5 maps and two mods for multiplayer, its very polished, fun and good game, and its free online, also they anancued a ton of free content through whole summer, with new maps every week or two, new mods, new weapons...
How do you see all that like a $20 downloadable game!?
Why we think it sell well?
-Incredibly fun and good game
-completly new and innovative gameplay
-fits Wii U community perfectly in terms of graphics, artstyle and gameplay
-testfire demo was a huge sucsess, almost only very positive feedback
-Nintendo is really pushing this game, almost like Mario Kart, they see Splatoon like next new big IP
|
Splatoon: a 7 hour campaign, short. 5 maps, not enough. 2 game mods.
Fat princess: 3.5 hours single player mode, 8 maps at launch, 6 multiplayer gamemodes.
Both were unique games with a unique artstyle.
Fat princess costed $15 when it came out. Please tell me how these two aren't comparable?
|
First, this is a first time ever that I heard for that game.
After little research, both game only could be compared in initial content, Splatoon is Nintendo triple AAA 3D shooter game with focus on online, that only lacs some content on launch, but we already know that more free content is arriving.
So, I cant relly see how you can see Splatoon like a $20 downloadable game.
