RolStoppable said:
Going to a restaurant isn't comparable to a video game that you expect to play over the course of several weeks or months. The comparison with episodic games is also flawed because episodes can also be purchased separately and as such reviewers use the price of an individual episode when judging any of the particular episodes. Additionally, the content of such episodes is narrative-driven and thus the quality can vary greatly between episodes. But Splatoon is a multiplayer-centric game, so all of the important things are already established in the initial release and therefore current performance is actually a good indicator of future quality. EDIT: Forgot the most important thing. The argument isn't that reviewers should praise Splatoon for adding content later, it's that they shouldn't deduct points for a lack of content when that complaint is going to be rectified over the course of the next three months. |
Content is something many reviewers take in count when doing a review.
And if they don't have to discount points, then reviewers should wait until all the content is released, free or not.
Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever
Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe
Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor
Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile