Solid-Stark said:
Am I reading this correctly? The 260x, 270, 270x, 285, 290, and 290x are getting rebrands. So we have,
AMD is really keeping those 2012 cards alive. You guys follow this better than me, but I'd guess that the 270 becomes 360x, 285 becomes 370x, and the 290 and 290x become the 380 and 380x, respectively. Which means the new 390 and 390x cards will be the HBM equipped cards. Is 8GB HBM unlikely? Earlier rumors suggested them to be pricey.
|
Just a little correction, the HD 7950 went to be the R9 280, not the 285.
The 7950 and 7970 were based of Tahiti, which was the first iteration of AMD's Graphics Core Next or GCN. Then came GCN1.1 which was Hawaii and came in the form of the 290 and 290X, and then came GCN1.2 which was Tonga with the 285.
On the 8GB HBM thing... yes, it's very unlikely. It is known that the first iteration of HBM comes in packages of 1GB, and since all the diagrams showed by AMD had only 4 packages, many sites guessed that 4Gb would be the limit.
Later, AMD's Joe Macri said that until now there had been a lack of optimization when it came to the use of memory because with GDDR5 they always worked with more than enough VRAM, but that now they had been working on ways to optimize how the card deals with it with "surprising results". Obviously, AMD wouldn't have to optimize that memory usage unless they went short of it, so the 4GB has been all but confirmed.
What still has to be confirmed is if those optimizations have worked and how "only" having 4GB will impact their performance.
Price is still a mistery, but big chip+new memory+liquid cooling... well, I doubt it will come cheaper than a reference GTX 980.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.