By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
Hynad said:

You're basically saying they should do the opposite of what I'm saying. Which is come back to the review and adjust it accordingly.

In your case, you say that they should inflate the score based on what the belief that what will come will be good, instead of scoring it based on what they factually have in front of them. I don't see how that's reasonable. It comes off to me as giving preferencial status to the game based on hype, not facts.

Well, I did say that I agree with the dolphin, so that naturally means that my opinion is the opposite of yours.

If they score the game solely on what's available now instead of what people are paying for, then there's a very high chance to be wrong. If they do it the other way around, then there's only a low chance that they will have been wrong. That's why my suggestion is reasonable.


It's not reasonable because it's based on assumptions, not on what's been played by the reviewer.

I'm not sure I should be surprised by your stance or not, all things considered.