RolStoppable said:
Well, I did say that I agree with the dolphin, so that naturally means that my opinion is the opposite of yours. If they score the game solely on what's available now instead of what people are paying for, then there's a very high chance to be wrong. If they do it the other way around, then there's only a low chance that they will have been wrong. That's why my suggestion is reasonable. |
It's not reasonable because it's based on assumptions, not on what's been played by the reviewer.
I'm not sure I should be surprised by your stance or not, all things considered.