By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goodnightmoon said:
daredevil.shark said:


So many excuses. I am really surprised after hearing so many excuses. What about people who are getting day one? They are not important? Review is alreay showing lack of content meaning.

People getting it day 1 knew exctly what they were going to have, Nintendo was pretty clear about it.

Now, the thing is, they should not give a score for something that is not already avalible, but should they fully ignore the fact that the game is going to grow for free every week through the summer and at the end will be bigger than we ever thought? 

It doesnt feel right to fully ignore that on the scores, there should be a balance imo. 

If the rest of the content was 30$ Dlc they would give it the same score, even if the content was announced for the next year, and not every week for the next few months. 



They shouldn't base anything on promises of things to come. They should and can only review what's there to experience.

What they should do is update their review once that content has been made available and advertise the update on their site so people take a second look. It's the only way to be fair about this. Increasing (or balancing, as you put it) the score due to upcoming content you can't even try now is absolutely ludicrous. 

The complaints about the lack of content for a full price game are totally legitimate right now.