By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goodnightmoon said:

Again, no, I can´t understand how the "The most original and enjoyable online shooter of the generation" has a 7.  I really doiesn´t make sense, and is the trend of all the low scores, you read it, and then you look at the score is like what?

At the end of the day that is the score of a boring game. 

But hey, is what it is, it was a risk and this is the pay, but is still a good metascore, so Ok.

It does make sense. It doesn't matter how good a game's core mechanics are, if someone doesn't believe it has enough content (relative to quality) to justify the price, they'll review it as such. How much individuals care will vary, but we shouldn't criticize those that do. It's a perfectly valid complaint to have against a game, and it's a common enough opinion that it needs to be well represented in a generalized score (and it appears it will be).

On a side note, i think you're putting a bit too much value in the phrase "The most original and enjoyable online shooter of the generation". Considering how few 'original' shooters we've had so far this gen (and the highest rated ones being remasters), that particular bar has been set pretty low.

Regardless, the end score seems good enough. Should settle in the 78 - 83 range.