Nintendo Fans Vs. Third-Party Developers & Entitlement

[Wyrdness]

Captain_Yuri said:

Yes, I understand that but that doesn't mean that it is alright for them to sell gimped versions of games on Nintendo platform + charge a premium and expect it to sell well... If they want a game to even have a chance of selling on the wiiU, they have to give the owners the full game with all the DLC cause if they don't, then they broke any legs that the game had from the start. Now I am not saying that the game will sell on the wiiU the same amount as any other console but when you are releasing a game that is inferior in every way other than graphics that directly effects the enjoyment of the overall game such as missing content, then they are riding the nonsense train.

I get why they don't want to prioritize the wiiU version but that doesn't mean that it is okay to sell a gimped version. If they don't want to give the full version, then don't bother releasing it at all cause no one in their right mind would actually pay for a gimped version when they can easily get a fully featured version on 5 other platforms. I expect them to either release a game that is fully featured or don't release one at all and not in the gray area of half assing it while charging a full price. And Nintendo fans have every right to bitch about it

I actually agree with this some what, Injustice for example released full price and never got the DLC etc... and Mass Effect 3 cost more then the trilogy pack released in the same week. Bare in mind developers have been approaching Nintendo platforms in a similar comparable manner for a while now so eventually the fanbase becomes nurtured to be wary of third party games hence why most people on the platforms stick to first and second party games.