SubiyaCryolite said:
sc94597 said:
oniyide said:
The game got more ambitious, especially since Namco stepped in. The game got more complex and they wanted to go harder. Too bad systems cant and tehy get left behind. They wanted this to be on WIi U, but alas it wasnt up to snuff with there final vision. Of course they should not have talked so much in the beginning. But lets not act like it was malicious, that is silly.
They should just released what they initally had for Wii U? For what? For people to complain it is gimped like they do for damn near most of the WIi U versions of multiplats? And they would still be called liars?
People arent complaining about cancelled PS360 version.
Emotions have to be set aside and logic has to come thru for a bit. No Wii U version? suspect. PS360 version cancelled? and people still believed a WIi U version would be coming? Even if it was it would be so different that they might as well had been two different games. |
The problem is that the developers chose to be deceptive when inquired with regards to the Wii U version after the PS360 was cancelled. They were asked about the status of the Wii U version, and the developers kept saying, "it is still coming, just need time to work on it." The last information on it was five months ago. It would be an entirely different story if it were 2013.
|
Think the tyre model was done then? From a quick search they first talked about this in October 2014. They obviously thought they could pull it off on Wii U. For the 10,000th time there werent any lies. http://www.wmdportal.com/projectnews/inside-project-cars-seta-tire-model/
|
Around the same time when the PS360 version was cancelled. Whether it is done or not is irrelevant. Ian made it clear that it would need to be removed in its entirety for a Wii U release. If they were indeed working on the Wii U version they would find out very quickly that it had poor performance impacts, and they should've made that clear to anybody who inquires - that at the time they didn't know. Being honest isn't just about not lieing. When one is fully honest they don't omit necessary information as well. Implicitly that is what was done here, they were allowing a wrongful assumption to perpetuate, if not intentionally adding to it by saying that the Wii U version was satisfying and that the Wii U is a good console. It's not like the game just started development in 2014.
