torok said: A lot of games look better than Crysis 1. Just to start, Crysis 2 and 3 and Metro Last Light. Killzone SF is way, way ahead of Crysis 1. Crysis 2 is substantialy ahead of C1 and C3 is a bit better than C3, that's on a similar level to Metro LL and SF. |
May I disagree with that assumption? Crysis did a splendid job, specially for an open world game that was limited to DirectX 9 shaders. Crysis 2 managed to improve performance mostly on the grounds it rendered fairly small areas limited by blocky architecture and object physics was mostly static and pre-set.
As to which looks better, well, they don't even take place on the same enviroments, do they.
OT - yes, they could. Releasing in the middle of the 28nm stall, specially opting for power-hungry AMD hardware, was never the best idea to begin with.