RolStoppable said:
If you want to know where Nintendo is going, then you have to listen to what they say instead of looking at the current market performance. If you focus on the latter, then yes, it looks like Nintendo has absolutely no clue. But it's a mistake to do that. I didn't suggest 2GB of internal storage for the next handheld, I pointed out what the 3DS has. The next handheld will definitely offer more internal storage, plus 128GB SD cards don't have to be the limit as storage capacities improve over time. XCX is an exception for game sizes, not the rule. If you run worst-case-scenarios for the Xbox One and PS4, then these systems can't store more than ten games either. But we don't hear much about that being a problem. |
They've talked the talk before but didn't walk the walk, if you know what I mean. Nintendo is really good and making things SOUND good, but then they don't deliver. I'd almost say it's naive to think Nintendo won't fuck up certain things about the NX/Fusion, but of course we don't know yet what those things could be right now.
Naw, I know you didn't mean that. All I'm saying is that you can't have all that much storage in a HH console, and that's why it might be a good idea to have that extra storage for patches and DLC on the actual game-card.
XCX might be the exception NOW for NINTENDO games, but I also think it's an indication of where game sizes are going. Just take a look at Bloodborne's download size; 41GB. It it only goes to show that certain games will need much bigger SD-cards. And I think the PS4/XB1 isn't the same things since they're stationary and you can easily hook up an external HDD with 1TB to them... that doesn't quitre work with a HH
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.