Should we start considering gang members terrorist?

[generic-user-1]

sales2099 said:

generic-user-1 said:

sales2099 said:

 

"Because you just can't" (I assume can means can't) isn't a viable counter. You can very much be considered a terrorist in a democracy if you want to change the political/religious landscape.

no its can.  you cant be a terrorist in a monarchy, or an oligarchy.  killing dictator isnt a crime, its a step towards your birthright, freedom.

I'm confused, we referring to democracies or dictatorships? Cause I thought this was about western countries and their definition of a terrorist. Elected officials, no matter what your views are of democratic election processes, are not dictatorships.

you can be a terrorist in a democracy but you cant be a terrorist in a dictatorship.   

the uk is very complicated, its a semi democratic theocracy. killing the PM or terrorising people at elections would be terrorism. killing the queen or soldiers on the other side isnt.  

and the ukraine hadnt a real vote they just voted in the west to legitimice a coop by nazis and oligarchs for the press.