Currently Online 
| Soriku said: I think Dark Souls 1 has a better setting than Bloodborne, and Dark Souls 1 is probably a more rounded game. That said, after hours with the combat and beating all of the bosses (did you fight any boss in BB?), the combat is one aspect that I definitely think is an improvement over Souls. Especially Dark Souls 2. At minimum it just feels better. |
Admittedly, I've played it only briefly, but what I've got from it is that its combat is more offensive than Souls - which is precisely why I like Souls more. That said, sometime in the future I do intend to play it, it does seem as a game worth playing, though I don't really care much for Van Helsinglish setting.
Anyway, although it's made by same dev and some similarities/comparsions are to be expected, I really don't consider BB as another Souls game, nor do I judge it by how it compars to Souls. Bottomline, again, comparing Witcher to any of those, being they are quite different games, is, again, just silly.
If anything, Witcher 3 could be compared to Gothic, and, though I can't speak for all, it seems to me that for us who are fans of later, this is the game quite up our alley.
