Soriku said:
Nem said:
Yes, and the Witcher has story and an open world to explore.
I havent played enough yet to form a good opinion, but Bloodborn isnt a game that interests me at all. Much like monster hunter its a very aquired taste acceptable of clunky controls and tolerance to waste of time from dieing. On top of that those souls games have no story worth talking about.
I can say this, Witcher 3 looks amazing and none of the criticisms you presented are legitimate. Your post read: I dont like this game because its not another of this other game i like.
Try Lords of the Fallen. |
If you don't have a problem with Witcher 3's controls, you shouldn't have a problem with Bloodborne's. Bloodborne definitely has the more fluid/smoother gameplay. Geralt really is a bit stiff and the game doesn't have great circular movement. This causes some minor issues when interacting with the environment (looting, igniting, examining). Hell Monster Hunter is better with this, it's just attacking can feel clumsy in that series. Bloodborne also has better camera tracking in combat. I hope they release a patch to address both of these things.
|
I havent had enough time with the game to decide wether its a problem or not, but it wasnt something that poped in my mind while playing.
With that said, i'm not defending the game. I hated the combat on the Witcher 2. But the OP's post is all about how he likes Bloodborn and wishes that this game was just like it. That is not a problem with the game, its a problem with him.
If i went into this game expecting a Xenoblade and made a thread saying how all those things are so much better and how i love it more on Xenoblade, it would be absolutely the same. Its a problem of misplaced expectations. He undermined his enjoyment of the game since the start.
