By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fps_d0minat0r on 16 May 2015
Edit Thread
TheJimbo1234 said:
daredevil.shark said:


Nope. None has paid to make inferior version. Reality is CDPR is still a small studio; not EA / Ubisoft big. They lack manpower to pull those graphics. Plus what I read from neogaf CDPR had to basically make two versions or two games if they wanted those visuals for PC. Since console versions makes good cash they choose the easy way.


So they lied to the consumer with false PR demos. 

That is still terrible and I won't support a studio who just lie.

Also, th Witcher 2 had great graphics for the time (albeit a power hungry engine) so why the change? Oh right, all they want is more money from a bigger market rather than delivering a quality product. Well this liitle studio is certainly acting like the big ones with such a dire attitude.

Yeah that makes sense.... to spend more time optimising the game for the market that they are getting the most money from... X1/PS4/Mid-range PC's.

What are you complaining about? That they didnt spend the time making the entire game look like the original trailer for the minority of gamers who would have been able to run it like that? why would they do that? Their jobs and future games are not reliant on the approval of the minority.