johnsobas said:
I don't think so. Nintendo helped fund those resident evil games on gamecube, and RE4 was released on PS2 and combined with the GC version sold around 4 million, then put the 1.7 million from the Wii version on top of that and the profits should be good. YOu might be right that they want to fund an engine, but not because of those games.
I suspect they want to re-release it in Japan because they feel some Japanese gamers didn't play it because they never had a gamecube, and this would put some attention back on the game. I doubt it will sell very many copies, but i doubt it will matter if it does or not. |
There's no proof Nintendo paid them for that. In fact, if they did, they could have sued Capcom for gimping the promised five exclusives. They could have given money, but Nintendo may not have thought they could spare the funds (liminted company, not a corporation).
Furthermore, Capcom lost a lot of money for two years (it's in their financial records), so even if Nintendo gave them money, it's gone now, and Capcom would want to maintain the profit margin of the last three years.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs