| Goodnightmoon said: "the combat system still lacks depth, and structure as questing never changes. As it is, it's a perfect game for whoever like to dive deep into a believable and vast imaginary world, but not for gameplay purists." "Sloppy combat and ongoing optimisation" "The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is a surprising failure as an open-world video game" "the number of smaller and bigger issues can surprise (in a bad way, of course). It is an amazing game but right now the amount of bugs is simply too high." I was not expecting this kind of coments, I´m surprised that the game is getting the same scores we though anyway. |
I'm not. Some of the very best games of all time have been flawed. Fallout, Dragon Age, and previous Witcher games come to mind. That's because these games are complex and multi-layered; it's quite possible for them to have a number of problems while having so much positive content that it overshadows the bad.
Simpler games can get closer to flawless but that doesn't mean that the overall experience is better (or worse). Personally, I'll take the complex-yet-flawed any day of the week.








