starcraft said:
Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
starcraft said:
Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
False. As I said earlier, IGN says that scores of 10 can hide flaws under features great enough to warrant a score of ten. Two different versions can have different kinds or amounts of flaws, as is the case here. The 360 version seems amazing, warranting a 10, but the PS3 version looks and loads better. Those are discernible differences. |
In another thread, someone quoted IGN's review system exactly, and it indicated that reviews are relative to the competition. If the Xbox 360 version received an identical score to the PS3 version, there cannot be a discerible difference.
|
Except that there is noticeably less aliasing on the graphics of the PS3 version, and the PS3 version sports faster load times. And the 360's frame rate drops more often. |
And it wasn't discernible enough to rssult in a change in the 360's score......... You guys hate this huh? It's like IGN threw you a carrot and then you realized there was a string attached to it slowly pulling the carrot away........ |
PS3 version looks and loads and runs better, even though there are enough good things about the game to warrant a score of 10 on 360.
I LOVE this. Rockstar has said it hasn't even mastered PS3 yet. This is so great. :) The PS3 and its 8-10 year life cycle is worth so much more than it costs...this is incredible.
