| starcraft said: That right there would be one example from the last 24 hours. I am certainly not immune from mistakes, but I think it is likely that am I incorrect on far fewer occasions than some of the regular customers from the same old SDF we are discussing here. We must have been discussing this for ten posts now, and yet we are still to see an example from you of one of these unsubstantiated, "outlandish" posts........ |
Thanks for point that out, I didn't read that post.
I will point out what I consider incredibly biased comments in this thread alone. I fear however, that it will just start up more ramblings like they did in the first place.
Here are a few quotes from you:
"If Bioshock 2 comes the the PS3, it won't sell very well, because it is HIGHLY unlikely that the first game will come to the PS3."
"You can't possibly play RPG's of any description, or you'd love your 360, and hate the PS3.
Matter of fact, that goes for just about any genre other than platformers (and that will change thanks to Banjo). "
The first one. You honestly think the GOTY sequel would not sell well if it was on something other then the 360? It would sell well regardless of console. Gears 2 would sell well on the PS3, and MG4 would sell great on the 360. Great games sell well.
Here is where I find extreme bias. If someone posted a thread saying MGS4 is coming to the 360, I don't think you would say it would not sell well, because 1 2 and 3 were not on an x-box.
You just don't want it to sell well on the PS3. That's an entirely different thing.
The second one. This is the one that got me calling you a fanboy. What you are saying there, is all gamers should hate the PS3, as all games fall into a genre, and all genre's should lead someone to hate the PS3 and love the 360.
How can you not find that last statement outlandish?
