| TheRealMafoo said: There is a huge difference between not having an interest in something, and hating it. That's the difference between a fan, and a fanboy. If all I wanted to play was RPG's, and I could only own one console, I would probably buy a PS3 with BC. All the RPG's for the PS1 and PS2 are better then the exclusive ones on the 360. Also Oblivion plays better on the PS3 then the 360, and the future looks better for the PS3. Anyway, that's not the point. They point is if I did find everything I wanted to play on the 360, and nothing I wanted to play on the PS3, I would dismiss it as a product I was not interested in. I would not hate it. The difference between the two is why you're a fanboy, and others are fans. |
Ahh, I see. So your taking the fact that I responded to a sarcastic post with a sarcastic comment as gospel?
Your whole fanboy argument when it comes to me is to state that I'm too crafty to post a blatantly anti-PS3, banworthy comment, but that I slowly chip away at the console. And yet you think that I would 'slip up' to the extent that I would say "you should hate the PS3" with any seriousness?
You label me a fanboy continuously, and always on the weakest grounds.
Also, would you really pay fivee times the cost of a PS2 for a BC capable PS3 just to play PS2 games? I wouldn't, but I don't have the option, as Sony are not currently gracing my region with the presense of a BC compatible model.
Personally, I think the future of RPG's on the 360 looks better than that of the PS3, but I see no reason to get into that argument here.
OT: There have been persistent rumours of Bioshock coming to the PS3. All have thus far proved false. The rumours have been shot down by 2K as surely as Kojima has shot down the prospect of a 360 version of MGS4.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
