By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
bobobologna on 26 April 2008
Edit Thread
Ail said:
starcraft said:
Flow said:
You are itching for a ban, aren't you?

How is this argument debunked if the game is still large? 25-40 hours is a lot of time and that's if you play the game straight into the missions, most people will probably spend 45-60 hours i think.
25-45 is anywhere between a quarter and half of the original game length estimates. How do you not consider that relevant?

 


IGN review of San Andreas ( yes I just read it again to post here) states that the game takes 40-60 hours for the main story..( which gives you around 50% completion says the review)

Now you would think that if you believe their estimate for GTA4 you gotta take the one for San Andreas at face value too.

Now last I checked 25-45 isn't anywhere between a quarter and a half of 40-60......

So make up your mind, either you take IGN at face value or you don't but stop trying to twist what they are saying to try to demonstrate what you want to in regards to the DLC.

So how about you get 100% completion in GTA4, 1000/1000 achievements and then you can come back post here and tell us how fast and easy it was and how eager you are to get the DLC because getting there was so fast and you more ...

 


He was talking about how someone had said that GTA4 was a game that would take 100 hours to complete.  Or something to that effect.  Even though it was pretty clear (at least to me) that he meant if you wanted to do everything there is in the game (get 100% completion).  Seriously, does anyone expect any game's main story to last 100 hours?  Even RPG's usually have tons of padding with extra side missions/quests/rare items.