tabsina said:
erm.. the most 'casual' gamers i know (who always ask me for technical advice) who own a wii got it modded right away without asking me for advice, which was out of character .. casuals aren't the idiots you make them out to be
i don't own either a 360 or PS3, so i'm seemingly completely unbiased when i asked this: Is your source anyone in addition to the well-known sony fanboy Hilary who did the IGN review?
|
Funny then that moderately pro-360 IGN put him on the job of reviewing the game.
That was the IGN review of the game, period. Advantage: PS3.
EGM, and there was a thread about this earlier today, also said advantage PS3, but gave PS3 the edge both in sharpness AND vibrancy, whereas "fanboy" Hilary gave 360 the advantage in "vibrancy."
LOL, 360 has more framerate problems. I bet that's just Hilary's fanboyness, too, huh?
Also, Hilary in the review says that Rockstar is pushing both consoles to their limit or some such nonsense, but Rockstar has said that they have most certainly *not* mastered Cell. PS3 will blow further by 360 as companies get closer to doing so.
Also, edge to PS3 in load times due to the hard drive. Why don't you go clock both versions and come back here and tell us if Hilary was being a fanboy, or if the *IGN REVIEW* didn't in fact have a reason to say that the PS3 version had the edge?







