| plip.plop said: This is a perfect example of a frivilous lawsuit. Instead of spending money and time focusing on conent, Companies have to deal with people like this, on a absolutley stupid point of arguement. If that article was never written where the developers alluded to a new way of achieving 1080. this lawsuit would have never come about. I stand by my statement that if pixel count means that much to you, you should just game on a PC, and restrict consoles to exclusives (If your eyes can bear it). I just find it hypocritical that people whose main gaming system last gen was not the torch bearer for "superior version" in terms of graphics, have now decided this gen that graphics resolution is now number one on their must have list. Granted the roles have flipped flopped, and the people that had the "superior version" of a game last gen now finds that graphics don't matter. Which proves my point pixel counting is worthless, and a waste of time. Look at the WiiU sitting quietly over there pumping out beautiful 720p games, and constantly having numerous GOTY nominations. proving that solid gameplay, and great level design trumps resolution. |
I agree the lawsuit is frivolous, but there's still no need to insult people for caring about IQ. I care about IQ, and i do own a gaming PC for precisely that reason, but that doesn't mean i don't also have standards for my consoles.
Regardless, there's a dramatic difference between believing something is a necessity and simply valuing it. I don't personally care much for 60fps in most console games, 30fps is usually adequate for me, but you don't see me insulting people for believing differently.
