Skullwaker said:
That is a horrible point. Like, really bad. The games aren't killing straight people because they're straight. If they were, then yes that qualify as a hate crime but I've never seen that in a game before. Besides, how do you know all of them were straight? Most of them were just generic looking background characters that could've easily been gay or transgendered and you'd never have any idea. Killing them in those games is fine because it's not discrimination. If I go up to someone and kill them because they're black/white/gay/straight that is the epitome of discrimination (and a hate crime). Point blank. |
Shooting pixels displaced as gays is hate crime? I must hate so many ethinicies. And most games we shoot because they are male, we almost never have women footsoldier to pile up, hate against men? It's just a freaking game. Why don't you fly to afeghanistan and parede against the killing of real gays instead of freaking out on the internet?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







