By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Tuulikk on 25 April 2008
Edit Thread
leo-j said:
Tuulikk said:
How was it now? Better graphics chip and RAM on Xbox 360 and more horsepower on PS3?

The Cell rapes the 360's CPU, and the 360 cannot use all its 512mb of ram for graphics, it can only use just above 300mb of ram for graphics. Graphics "Card" is just barely better on the 360, but dont forget the CELL is capable of rendering real time graphics without the RSX doing anything to support it.


Thanks for the answer, man!

 I did not know about Xbox 360 to only be able to use 300 MB RAM for graphis. anyway, still better than PS3s 256 MB for graphics?

 True about Cell i guess, RSX came in late in the making right?

I still think there is much left in graphics to explore on Xbox 360. But to just have DVD and not copyng parts of games to HDD must be really bad for the future, just like the limited gamesizes for N64, right?