zorg1000 said:
And that is somehow relevant? |
If the Idea was to point that lower price is the biggest reason for sales then ps2 selling at 299 more than gc would sell for life while being Always alot lower than that is quite telling.
Also when WiiU in 1 year at 299 lose to ps4 399 in like 4 months you know the concept is wrong. You can say the better perceived value matters, price just can't be excessive. And this also disproves gc was cheaper to make. Unless you believe they dropped 66% of the price on like 2 years and also disprove Nintendo never sell hw at a loss (which they done with 3DS). Is just that they learnt that playing pricewar with PlayStation is useless.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."