The strongest and more expensive console will win this generation, it never happened before.

[zorg1000]

DonFerrari said:

Torillian said:

You win by having the highest marketshare in the console market for that generation.  That's what everyone else understands winning a console generation to mean.  if the company goes broke winning that generation you can make the debate that it wasn't worth it, but they still would have won that console generation based on the only metric that we have to measure these things by.  

What reason is there to base something on conjecture instead of facts?

He also ignored that GC was 150, a lot cheaper than both PS2 and Xbox and were destroyed in the market... but maybe they had 200 profit per console sold... the logic is very faulty.

A lot cheaper? I didn't realize the difference between $150 & $200 or $100 & $150 was considered alot.