Torillian said:
MS's company has to split its resources across software development as well as Xbox, Sony has to make TVs, why don't we include those? Simple, because it's not about being fair to a company it's about something measureable that we can define. Handhelds are just as relevant to a question of who won a console generation as Windows or Vaio Computers. It's not about what's fair, it's about what applies to the question and is measurable. it isn't "who was the biggest success story"? the question is "who won the console generation" which is again defined by the only numbers we are actually given to base success off of for consoles. In that sense, yes, the Xbox was 2nd in its console generation while GC was last. |
Says who? Fans on a gaming forum? Sorry, I don't agree with that.
I include handhelds because they're dedicated gaming platforms. TVs and operating systems like Windows are not. Look up the definition of console btw:
"A video game console is a device that outputs a video signal or visual image to display a video game. The term "video game console" is used to distinguish a console machine primarily designed for consumers to use for playing video games in contrast to arcade machines or home computers. It includes the home video game consoles, the handheld game consoles, the microconsoles and the dedicated consoles."