People who would argue for games being considered art in one breath can't seriously come argue for censorship on their other breath. If a person feels sexually aroused by the depiction of a fictional representation of a minor, that's on them, not on the creator of the art piece. Also, what is the argument that's being presented exactly to support this censorship? Is it because it puts anyone in danger? Do those people think it turns a non pedophile into a pedophile? What exactly is the claim here? The question also makes certain assumptions that seem totally inapropriate, like there being a measurable standard of what's sexy or sensual. Sensuality, like beauty, is pretty much in the eye of the beholde. So what person A finds sexy i might find totally dull. So who is the arbitror of what's sexy exactly?
On a side note, if any person has sexual attraction to minors, i think it would be much better for this person to have an escape from reality to satisfy their urges on a fantasy set than going out to the world and do some really bad shit.
Everyone has some type of fantasies that should remain that, so thank goodness for all kinds of porn and fanfictions. That's made the world a much better place
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
