DonFerrari said:
zorg1000 said:
I really don't get this argument, if Nintendo's practices to 3rd parties were so evil than why did they continue releasing games for them? Couldn't they have easily said, "fuck off Nintendo!!!!" and developed their games elsewhere?
SG-1000 by Sega literally released the same day as Famicom in Japan and NES shipped a whopping 200,000 in America at the time of the Sega Master System & Atari 7800 releases. 3rd parties had other options if they felt they were being mistreated, yet they stuck by Nintendo's side and kept making games for them.
|
Because the other platforms weren't viable... if they released for another company they couldn't release for Nintendo, so they would lose the lot bigger enviroment.
|
U just ignored what I said, there was no bigger environment.
SG-1000 released the exact same day as Famicom (NES) in Japan.
NES had shipped only 200,000 in the US when the competitors released.
If Nintendo's restrictions were so harmful to 3rd parties they wouldn't have supported Nintendo in the first place.