| shio said: Fable 1 was mediocre: bad story/lore, too short, too easy, the romance was as shallow as possible, and the supposed main feature (aging) was immersion-breaking. I have no faith in Molyneux and I was a big fan of Bullfrog (I have Theme hospital and Dungeon Keeper 2) Fable 2 has too much competition this year. It might get 2008 Console RPG of the Year if Fallout 3 starts sucking even more than it seems right now. However the PC has ALOT more anticipated RPGs than Fable 2: - Dragon Age - Mass Effect - Space Siege - The Witcher: Enhanced Edition - World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King - Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning - Age of Conan I doubt Fable 2 is going to get above the PC RPGs |
Dragon Age: Do you have ANY clue??? Right, thats what I thought. Even Bioware aint in position to say anything about this game. And it may be out by 2010
Mass Effect....Err... 360...last year... etc...
Space Siege: RPG? Highly doubtful. Hack n Slash? Maybe.
The Witcher: Enhanced Edition...Again, 2007. Mate, the game is out. I finished it. Great work. That's it. A great old school RPG.
World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King
-Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning
-Age of Conan
The 3 of them. MMOs. Tell a hardcore RPG player that these games are actually RPGs. You'll have a keyboard in your forehead in no time. You compare MMO with single player RPGs? Since when?
The all PC section of your post: FAIL
Your opinion about Fable 1 is respectable and acceptable. But in the rest of your writing you just muddy the water.
