S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
And it's very good to know that if you choose ps or xbox you will have access to 90% of library on the gen for console. Just having to choose which 1st party and key exclusives you preffer. And if you want both the transition is easy, same basic control layout and mapping for the last 20 years while on Nintendo you have to relearn the controller to do the same thing just because they like to overcomplicate without reason.
I buy their console after gen for cheap because I just want the key titles and I would lose too much if I done the inverse and bought ps after. And on customer friendness, I can buy games from anywhere and with several use without worry, while Nintendo want to determine where I have to buy and the disc is fail prone since it's a normal dvd.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."