| teigaga said: I'm saying I don't feel deterred because I'm going to judge the game on how enjoyable it looks based on trailers/gameplay, sounds based on previews/reviews and plays when I do eventually get my hands on it. Dissapointment at it lacking a certain feature is understandable (space battles), my sentiment wasn't that no one can criticise the game, its that people are being overly pessimistic. When people are saying this game looks like a Turd and F*ck Dice, they essentially basing quality on arbituary assets which don't really reflect on what the game may deliver. We haven't even seen the gameplay in action. Essentially my point is I'm going to wait and see, none of whats been offered gives us any incite into the quality of the game. For me personally that trailer inspired so much excitement because the extent to which they captures the feel of the universe, something the previous games never did as well despite their space battles etc. My main concern is whether it offers a satisfying offline experience as someone who doesn't game online a ton but used to play BF2 with my sibling in local gameplay, thats the type of thing that for me will determine my enjoyment. if someone else enjoyment is determined by space battles or destructible environments then fair enough. |
they cut important features. and the scale of the battle is smaller than in the last one, just 40 persons in mp is weak. no mod support is realy bad and they no Galactic conquest mode is bad too. and that the AT-ATs are on rails is just a joke. its a big step backwards and it kills all hopes for a real Battlefront with all the great features the old ones had.
