By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q on 20 April 2015
Edit Thread
Soriku said:
HollyGamer said:
From ancient of times until now many people try to create life form a dead cell or chemicals composition, the result is " ZERO ". Many scientists even try to create single living cell from protein but until now there are none. Randomness will create nothing but creation or living being and material was build structurally perfect. even human DNA and RNA is have a perfect math and calculation for each pair .


If DNA/RNA was built "perfectly" no organism would have illnesses, diseases, birth defects. That's obviously not the case.

Are one of the people who believes that birth is being guided by some god, as opposed to being a natural process? What about evolution?

HollyGamer said:
From ancient of times until now many people try to create life form a dead cell or chemicals composition, the result is " ZERO ". Many scientists even try to create single living cell from protein but until now there are none. Randomness will create nothing but creation or living being and material was build structurally perfect. even human DNA and RNA is have a perfect math and calculation for each pair .

God of the gaps.

The OP doesn't have a very strong case. How do you go from "there are opposites in nature" to "there must be a creator"? Similarly, the hierarchy argument is just silly. The distribution of wealth is just a logical organization that makes note that not everyone will have the same amount of resources - not like the world is perfectly uniform. Similarly, organisms have adapted to a wide range of environments and ecological situations. Naturally, some will exhibit different types of emergent properties, ranking them higher than others on the biological hierarchy, although this doesn't make some organisms "better" than another. This is also distinctly related to evolution, not a supernaturally-guided process.


well no you misunderstood what i was saying

"Similarly, the hierarchy argument is just silly"

"ranking them higher than others on the biological hierarchy, although this doesn't make some organisms "better" than another."

 

i didn't say that any organism is "better" than another... my point was that the rarer group always rises to the top of the heirarchy in all facets in existance 

 

your points about adaptations to environments and so on is all superfluous fluff

 

the point is that in any ecosystem there will be producers at the bottom that are far more numerous, then a smaller group about that, then another, then another... till you get to the capstone of the pyramid which is us man... the ultimate apex organism on this planet

 

this rule applies to everything with regards to wealth distribution again you will always have a poorer more numerous class at the bottom and up to another group, and up again and so on till you get to the apex/capstone

 

as i said i could list examples endlessly till my hair turns grey and drops out because these are rules that form our underlying reality

 

oh here's another one that i'm sure you agree with