naruball said:
That's why we can't have nice things. Did the ps(one) or the ps2 cost $600? No? Interesting why you'd choose the ps3 over the other two as an example. Let's also forget that they were losing $200 on each ps3 sold and that each ps3 cost less than any bluray player at the time. Pure greed, fo sho. |
Did Sony have a monopoly when the PS1 released? You know... Their first console.
Not greed, but arrogance. But hey, if you like paying $600 for your console, be my guest.
The reason why I picked the PS3 as an example should have been obvious: Sony didn't screw up with their other two consoles. Clearly my post went over your head completely.
The world isn't black and white.