By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
spemanig said:

Because the logic that if something is selling poorly, it's because it does everything wrong is simple and flawed. It's far more complicated than that. It does a lot bad and a few good, but the bad far overshadows the good. The Wii U bringing back analog sticks is not part of the bad. If anything, the only reason it's even sold as much as it has is because it brought them back.

The controller is the most obvious part of any video game console. People realize that the standard controller determines what kind of games are going to be made for that system.

The GameCube had a dual analog controller and flopped. The Wii didn't have a dual analog controller and was a raving success. Logically, the sound business decision would be to build on the success instead of the failure.

But I am interested, what makes you believe that the dual analog controller made the Wii U sell better than it would have otherwise?


if you're really too dense to see that the reason the Wii U failed was marketing and confusion relating to its name then you're hopless :O the controller was far from its issue, and if it was part of the issue it was due to the tablet feature (a lot of users don't care about having that feature and don't want to pay the extra money for it) not the dual analog sticks. Dual analog sticks are on virtually every controller these days

 

you're confused entirely it seems