By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Materia-Blade on 16 April 2015
Edit Thread
Xxain said:
Materia-Blade said:

Then why not make it ps3 + wii u and leave ps4 out? wii u has a higher installed base in japan an this combination isn't redundant, like ps3 + ps4.


What do you mean by redundant? The PlayStation fanbase is the number 1 place for console JRPG's. Period. It has been that way since the PS1 and it will never change as long as Final Fantasy, Tales, Persona, wharever... favors the PlayStation brand. PS fanbase is divided between 2 consoles and SE's choice of consoles releases ensures they're all potentially accounted for. Japanese developers in general will continue to have PS3 versions of their games for a loong time as a response to Japanese gamers being slower about migrating. PSP is still getting games! There is nothing redundant about the choice.

You really can't see why it's redudant to release on both ps3 and ps4? It's the same audience.

"The PlayStation fanbase is the number 1 place for console JRPG's. Period. It has been that way since the PS1 and it will never change as long as Final Fantasy, Tales, Persona, wharever... favors the PlayStation brand."

That's probably one of the most wrong and contradictory things I've read. you said the playstation fanbase was number 1 for jrpg and then you said that it's because of support. Let me tell you one thing, it's easy to sell more of anything when said thing isn't released much elsewhere. The ps home consoles got more jrpgs than it's competitors. if things had been equal, software sales would also be. It has nothing to do with ps audience. Just take a look at the shit ton of jrpgs on nintendo's handhelds. they sell because it's there.

One more time: The ps fanbase isn't the number 1 place for jrpgs, they are just the ones that had access to more jrpgs in home consoles so far.