By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Smear-Gel said:
mornelithe said:

And by people, you mean 1 person who used the word invalid.  Hyperbole man, hoooooooooooooooooooooooo!

For all the non-edge of the cliff type folks, they've made a decent effort explaining their thoughts/concerns regarding the study.


It definitely wasnt just one person.

 

People who game on phones/social gamers need to somehow validate thier game playing a lot more than we expect other gamers to, because of the stigma we have against phones. Nobody cares how much that kid who got an Xbox One for christmas and plays minecraft and COD knows about the wider gaming market.

More hyperbole.  Clearly, some people care.  And clearly, not every gamer is a kid.  Or...did you not read anything in the report?   And who has a stigma against phones (More hyperbole?).  Haven't seen anyone say they hate phones, or that they live in a 'no phone household'.   Clearly there's an issue with labeling freemium games in the same category as your $60 software.  But, that'd be a stigma against freemium games, not phones.