By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Materia-Blade said:
Hynad said:

Still brining up the exceptions, not the rule. 

So you're saying I can't bring up these two games because they weren't mentioned before I brought them up? What the heck is that kind of way of arguing?

I brought them up because they illustrate quite well my argument that 3D games age badly. A few exceptions that didn't age as badly doesn't make this less of a fact. Most games from the 5th gen aged quite badly. A majority of the 6th gen games are already showing their age. And things only get worse as time goes by. Let those games age and come back to me in 10 years if you want to make a case.




You were shown examples of games that aged well, then you talked about two games that weren't mentioned and, most importantly, are from the dawn of 3d gaming. 5th gen games didn't visually age well because it was the start of 3d. 6th gen games and onwards aged much better.

So of course a game from N64 will get updated graphics during a remaster, because it can use the upgrade and it won't cost much. starting from 6th gen games, their remasters otend to nly change resolution and effects, because their graphics aged better.

You and I have nothing to discuss, on any matter implying Nintendo. You jump at everyone who doesn't paint that company as godly. It's tiresome. There is absolutely no reason for me to give further examples, and I could provide countless from the 6th gen, because I know all too well the kind of response to expect from you.

I'll leave it at that.