Gamer1211 said:
theRepublic said:
Gamer1211 said:
theRepublic said:
I agree that the 360 isn't dead. It's here to stay, and the PS3 will not be catching it for another two years. That means it is going to get plenty of game development.
However, I'm pretty sure Microsoft started out this generation selling the 360 at a loss, so that point isn't quite right. I do believe they are selling at a small profit now (not sure if I am right on this).
I would like to point out that Patcher is generally viewed in a negative light on this site, since he is wrong so often.
I actually agree with you about BluRay. I think it will have a very tough time catching on with average consumers.
As for your other points about development costs, and install base, I think you are forgetting that little white box known as the Wii (although you are right if you only consider the HD consoles). |
The wii is by far the cheapest but I was referring to the HD consoles as you stated. Secondly, the 360 was sold at a loss for an extremely short period of time. Please refer here:http://www.techspot.com/news/23612-microsoft-makes-tiny-profit-on-xbox-360-hardware.html |
That article is from November 2006. The 360 was launched in November 2005. That is a full year of losses. I would not call that "an extremely short period of time." |
$70 in 1 year so my guess is $35 in 6 months, $17.50 in 3 months... |
Hmmmm. As I can recall, because of RRoD MS werent in profit. It wasnt until Halo3 came out that the MS Games division finally got into the Black. And since then they have been making quite a bit.
