| Vasto said: I never said that it will be the only things its used for but its what its being used for right now. Gaming is the focus of VR from both Morpheus and Oculas. When they show different then we can talk different. AR is showing the ablity to play games and do other things in the real world which VR will never be able to do. You cant do anything in the real world if you have a VR headset on because the whole purpose of VR is to take you away from the real world. |
You might want to look at your previous post shown here:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7216384
To me, you clearly state that VR is completly, utterly, and entirely going to be used for "kids toys". I then inferred that a "kids toy" refers to something trivial like gaming. So yeah, you did state that VR would only be used for gaming.
I am not going to explain why Project Morpheus is game centric. Go read my previous post again.
In bold: I think the only way to get through to you is by giving you an example of what MIcrosoft did in the past. Go watch a nearly 4 minute video on Project Natal (Kinect) before it was released to the public shown here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_txF7iETX0
and then go look up all of the various applications that Kinect is being used today. How is it possible that Mircosoft presented a game centric periphal yet its being used in so many different applications around the world!? Does that sound like Project Morpheus in the near future?! The answer is yes....
The rest of your statements are you just rambling on about why AR is better than VR. Of course there are going to be things that AR can do that VR can't do. That's why they are called two different things. Shocker!
I could just as easily mention things that VR can do that AR will never be able to do. I really don't understand why you brought this up other than to downplay VR. You completely dismiss VR and everything it has to offer instead of giving praise where praise is due.
