superchunk said:
Hey no problem. 1. I don't think there are that many websites out there that still force themselves to be less than 800x600, so I deliberately went slightly larger. In fact I just randomly went to 10 different big box retail chains websites and none of them fit in that resolution. Heck, vghcartz is wider than the sites I have created. 2. Most people are not like you. They won't run pages though html and css validators. I plan on targeting small business and people who literally have no idea. (i.e. the mass) Though you do make a good point that I should still ensure that it is valid based on my doctype so, I will fix that tonight. |
Generally retail websites and website that run with a lot of ads tend to be very wide. 800x600 isn't a requirement by any means, just something to consider. Your website doesn't have much content and really doesn't need to be that wide so shortening it might not be a bad idea especially considering the level of technology your target audience may have. ^_~
Awesome. They're minor errors though I'm still quite confused as to why you moved the target attribute into the CSS file...







