By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mai said:
ps4tw said:

a) Who has fooled who if you think there is no such thing as non-biased news reporting?

Yes, there's no such thing as unbiased news reporting. Mind I remind you extremely one-sided position of Al-Jazeera on Lybian conflict and photos pusblished by Reauters on Georgian conflict, when they failed to mention the fact that said photos were staged. If you fail to see their bias that's most likely you have one of your own. Check who owns Al-Jazzera for god's sake, that's not that hard.

ps4tw said:

b and c) Doesn't matter. If you want to talk politics, best to try and use a good source, not one of the worst.

So far so good this thread have 2.5 decent opinions on the matter, while yours is as pointless as it hollow -- fire is hot, water is wet -- more or less good equivalent. I assume that's because you use "good sources"? I'd suggest you don't tell me what I should use, and I won't tell you where you should go and what to do with yourself, so we keep this civilized, ok?

While Al-Jazeera will be biased towards certain ME politics, it's very good at reporting on Western affairs, and Reuters on generally all affairs as it prides itself on being impartial. With those photographs, it was never proven if they were fake, and at any rate were provided by the AP, a trustworthy source. If they were staged, that will have been on account of a rogue photographer and nothing to do with Reuters or AP.

You last paragraph is little more than "You can't tell me what to do". I'm giving you good advice - it's up to you whether you take it or have a tantrum.