By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Volterra_90 on 07 April 2015
Edit Thread
Ruler said:
Volterra_90 said:

Okay, I see the diference. But in the end, they are similar. The only difference is giving it as a standalone physical release or as a digital downloadable content. I don't actually mind the "format" of the release, only that the expansion/DLC is valuable.


Standalone actually allows you to just pay 20-30 bucks and playing without the main game, dlc requires you to own the 60$ main game

I'm definitely stuck in the past. I remember buying an expansion for The Sims and it didn't work without the main game (I was young... lol). On topic, the point is that if the main game has a lot of content (and I think that The Witcher 3 will have it) and the DLCs/expansions/whatever are worth the prize, I'm fine with it. I really hate when you have to pay like 20 bucks for a 2 hours mission or something like that. That's abussive. I like how Nintendo handle the DLCs with Mario Kart, or Tecmo Koei with Hyrule Warriors or From Software with Dark Souls II (I know some people find them expensive, but I don't think so). And The Witcher 3 with the expansion pass costs 75 bucks. 5 more than The Order: 1886. Sorry to bring this game in the topic, but I think the contrast is clear.