By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Materia-Blade said:
The_Yoda said:
Materia-Blade said:
The_Yoda said:

If we are talking only about homosexuals then I take it you fall in with the side that believes homosexuality to be biological rather than a choice?

you seem to be on the side that thinks it makes a difference wheter it's a choice or not. the fact is that it's a preference and anyone against it is automatically wrong.

This is contrary to what you said before is it not. Look at your two quotes I bolded. To me preference is chioce which is why I was calling the first bolded statement out as hypocritical.

Preference is not a choice but even if it was, anyone against homosexuality is automaticaly wrong in my eyes.

I mentioned it as preference because it's no different than liking certain foods/clothes/games... Can't you see how terrible it is to discriminate against a preference that isn't your business?

Corrected that for you.

You're right prefernece influences choice, but it isn't the same thing as choice.

You saying "anyone against homosexuality is automaticaly wrong" is no different than IF i held the view of "anyone for homosexuality is automatically wrong" when you say something like this you seem imobile in your opinion or close minded.  Your way is the only right way and anyone that doesn't agree is wrong. Seems an awful lot like the "bigots" you seem to dispise.  If you can prove to me there is a gene that causes people to be gay and personal choice plays absolutely no part in homosexuality then I will conceed that it is completely biological and you're not being hipocritical in your dug in stance.