Skullwaker said:
I'm talking about the consumer. They should have the right to walk into a public establishment and be treated the same as everyone else. If they built that land on a separate property not affiliated with the United States, then they can enforce their bigotry. But they're apart of a nation that has established laws and people here have rights. They can't simply ignore that. Would you be saying the same thing if a black man walked into a barber shop and the barber rejected his service because of his race? Is that more acceptable? |
Sorry man I'm still not getting how you're relating that to choice. Are you saying they should be able to choose if they are going to do business with a person that doesn't agree with their lifestyle rather than the business owner choosing not to do business with them?
