By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. said:
tak13 said:


Exactly!


He was known for being of the major minds which caused the British to loosen their grip on India when it was being occupied. It's also said that he was a purist.

So he was religious (a man is the sum of his parts) and he helped his country but religion had no positive part to play ... King was religious (a man is the sum of his parts) and he helped with the advancement of our society.  Yet you still insist on carving that away from them so that "Religion pushes society back. It always has and always will. Society's progress has always occured outside of religion" can be true?