S.T.A.G.E. said:
t3mporary_126 said:
No because that club has most likely adverised that that they are a female only club. If they did not, then yeah, they could very likely be sued. Business that don't explicitly come forward about their stance against gays or lesbians should do the same because most Americans are accepting gays and lesbians as equals. Business that do not come forward should not need a law that prevents them from hiding their belief. If they are afraid of advertising, "We only serve heterosexuals" will lose heterosexual customers as well, then that's their problem and not the gay and lesbian community. Not advertising their business policy and wasting a gay and lesbian effort to do business with them is false advertising.
|
Chic-Fil-A came out as anti-gay before the leader died. The stupidity of it all is that they cannot tell who is gay from who isnt unless its out there smacking them in the face. Chic-Fil-A knows they can get away with it and still profit because of the fact that the US is 60% Christian.
|
We should give credit where credit is due though. Although chick - fil - a thinks gay marriage is wrong, they won't discriminate against gays who want their products. That's why they're still in business. Plus, the owner publicly admitted his mistake in making the company a symbol in the marriage debate back then.
And although most Americans may be Christian, 37 of the 50 states support gay marriage. Indiana's stance toward gay and lesbian and this law is definitely in the minority. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see this law get repealed pretty soon (and rightfully so).
