| RubberWhistleHistle said: Guys, I have an extremely difficult test to study for so I can't play anymore, but I do agree with cone gamer that the focus on me saying it was a fact is completely silly. It was obviously a play on how people title their prediction threads, which has kind of been a theme of mine. But anyways, I'll argue with you guys tomorrow if I have time, and the first thing I will address is that ridiculous point about the zelda remakes. |
Take all the time you need to come up with a retort, no need to give an excuse.
But let me Pre-empt you regardless.
"But they add stuff it isnt just a resolution bump!"
As do most of the remasters on other consoles, a particularilly fine example being Master Chief collection.
"But they're from really old games not recent games!"
The relative age of a title that has been remastered does not matter, the breakdown is simply that they are reusing an existing game release to turn a profit without making a new game from scratch, thus the "age" argument holds little water.
"But they added 3d/touchscreen features/map/etc"
As do many of the PS4 and XBO remasters, GTAV for example adds a much more robust online infrastruture with new modes and gameplay styles as well as first person mode which changes the games dynamic entirely.
Pure and simple, you can't be against game re-relases on the PS4/XBO then excuse the ones on 3DS/WiiU as being "okay", because they are of the same ilk, the only reason anyone would claim otherwise is because of clear and obvious bias.
Can I ask that in future if you really must make a thread, you actually try making one that isn't entirely based off of starting arguments and stiring the pot? It seems to be a common and recurring theme of yours to make threads that seemingly gear more towards destructive ends than engaging ones, you may wish to kerb this habbit in future.
