By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RubberWhistleHistle said:
Hedra42 said:
It's not a fact, it's a proposal for debate. If it was presented as such, I might take it more seriously and have an intelligent conversation about it.


it is a fact. what generation could be worse? (and leave gens 1 and 2 out of it because that would be a cheap shot)


If it were a fact, there would be proof so irrefutable it would be pointless discussing it. Yet you feel the need to discuss it, which is contradictory. Also, I see you're changing the rules already to exclude gens that might threaten the viability of your so called 'fact'.