By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nuvendil said:
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:
Nuvendil said:
Bu...B-But...I thought there was a conspiracy against Sony?





:P

I saw this coming. Souls games score well. Never bought into the whole "anti-Sony" conspiracy people kept talking about.

No souls game has scored this high before.  So throw that argument out the window.  Not saying conspiracy but certain games there was a vendetta before release

Demon's Souls scored an 89, Dark Souls 89, Dark Souls II 91.  Thos are high scores.  I never said "every souls game has scored the exact same score as Bloodborne."  So throw your argument out the window. 

The real issue brought out in recent months is that people need to understand that liking a game does not make it worthy of a high score.  That's how it is in every single solitary artistic and entertainment medium on the face of the earth. 

Ummm no because my argument stands while yours was proven wrong.  Sorry but scoring "well" doesn't come into play because none of them have done this "well" and it's coming out during a gen that is scored much harsher.  Even not factoring that in though it has an aggregate score 2 higher than the highest scoring game in the series.  Even if we're going from 61 to 63 that's still higher sorry.



I am Iron Man